Learning Design frameworks.
Above is a mind-map that was created using the online concept-mapping tool bubbl.us. The mind-map is an outline of a few different learning design frameworks. Included are the TELSTAR model of inquiry (Marsh, 2008, p.153), Dimensions of Learning (Marzano & Pickering, 1997), Productive Pedagogies (Department of Education, 2002), The Technological Pedagogical Framework (TPCK) (Mishra & Koehler, 2006), Learning engagement theory (Kearsley & Shneiderman, 1998), Bloom's Taxonomy (Teachnology, n.d), and the Big 6 (Eisenberg, Johnson, & Berkowitz, 2010).
The learning design frameworks that I have decided to focus on for assesement 2 and 3 are a mixture of the TELSTAR model of inquiry, Learning engagement theory and Bloom's Taxonomy. I have chosen these particular three, because I believe that they link closely to one another and if used together could help create well developed learning experiences.
They can be used when intergrating technology into a lesson and they have collaboration elements. This is something that is essential when communicating in an online environment. Bloom's Taxonomy also has the two types of thinking - lower order thinking and higher order thinking- (Teachnology, n.d).
References:
Eisenberg, M., Johnson, D., & Berkowitz, B. (2010) Information, communications, and technology (ICT) skills curriculum based on the big 6 skills approach to information problem-solving. Retrieved from: http://moodle.cqu.edu.au/file.php/4034/LMC_Big6-ICT_Curriculum_LMC_MayJune2010.pdf
Kearsley, G., & Shneiderman, B. (1998) Engagement theory: A framework for technology-based teaching and learning. Retrieved from: http://home.sprynet.com/~gkearsley/engage.htm
Marsh, C. (2008). Studiesof society and environment- exploring the teaching possibilities (5th ed). Frenchs Forest, NSW: Pearson Education Australia.
Marzano, R.J.,& Pickering, D.J.(with Arrendondo, D.E., Paynter, D.E., Blackburn, G.J., Brandt, R.S.,...Whistler, J.S.).(1997). Dimensions of learning teacher's manual (2nd ed). Alexandra, VA. ASCD.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record 108 (6), p 1017-1054.
Teachnology. (n.d). Bloom's taxonomy verbs. Retrieved from: http://www.teach-nology.com/worksheets/time_savers/bloom/
The State of Queensland (Department of Education). (2002). A guide to... productive pedagogies classroom reflection manual. Retrieved from http://education.qld.gov.au/public_media/reports/curriculum-framework/productive-pedagogies/pdfs/prodped.pdf
Above is a mind-map that was created using the online concept-mapping tool bubbl.us. The mind-map is an outline of a few different learning design frameworks. Included are the TELSTAR model of inquiry (Marsh, 2008, p.153), Dimensions of Learning (Marzano & Pickering, 1997), Productive Pedagogies (Department of Education, 2002), The Technological Pedagogical Framework (TPCK) (Mishra & Koehler, 2006), Learning engagement theory (Kearsley & Shneiderman, 1998), Bloom's Taxonomy (Teachnology, n.d), and the Big 6 (Eisenberg, Johnson, & Berkowitz, 2010).
The learning design frameworks that I have decided to focus on for assesement 2 and 3 are a mixture of the TELSTAR model of inquiry, Learning engagement theory and Bloom's Taxonomy. I have chosen these particular three, because I believe that they link closely to one another and if used together could help create well developed learning experiences.
They can be used when intergrating technology into a lesson and they have collaboration elements. This is something that is essential when communicating in an online environment. Bloom's Taxonomy also has the two types of thinking - lower order thinking and higher order thinking- (Teachnology, n.d).
References:
Eisenberg, M., Johnson, D., & Berkowitz, B. (2010) Information, communications, and technology (ICT) skills curriculum based on the big 6 skills approach to information problem-solving. Retrieved from: http://moodle.cqu.edu.au/file.php/4034/LMC_Big6-ICT_Curriculum_LMC_MayJune2010.pdf
Kearsley, G., & Shneiderman, B. (1998) Engagement theory: A framework for technology-based teaching and learning. Retrieved from: http://home.sprynet.com/~gkearsley/engage.htm
Marsh, C. (2008). Studiesof society and environment- exploring the teaching possibilities (5th ed). Frenchs Forest, NSW: Pearson Education Australia.
Marzano, R.J.,& Pickering, D.J.(with Arrendondo, D.E., Paynter, D.E., Blackburn, G.J., Brandt, R.S.,...Whistler, J.S.).(1997). Dimensions of learning teacher's manual (2nd ed). Alexandra, VA. ASCD.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record 108 (6), p 1017-1054.
Teachnology. (n.d). Bloom's taxonomy verbs. Retrieved from: http://www.teach-nology.com/worksheets/time_savers/bloom/
The State of Queensland (Department of Education). (2002). A guide to... productive pedagogies classroom reflection manual. Retrieved from http://education.qld.gov.au/public_media/reports/curriculum-framework/productive-pedagogies/pdfs/prodped.pdf
No comments:
Post a Comment